Search for: "California v. Mejia"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2010, 8:42 am
(Mejia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:42 am
Tags: California, deep pocket, jackpot justice, noneconomic damages, pedestrian, personal responsibility, vicarious liability Related posts Carelessness for millions in New York City (15) Driver falls asleep: jury blames Ford to tune of $61M (14) December 2 roundup (1) City streets not safe to drive 100-120 mph on (6) Weidner v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
In Hoffman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:16 am
Stanford unsuccessfully invoked California's rules on non-compete clauses,Cal. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Mejia, No. 052856, 056683, 061744 Convictions for conspiracy to commit assaults with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence are vacated where: 1) the testimony of the Government expert witness violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment; and 2) that error was not harmless. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
Mejia (D.C. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 2:23 am
In a detailed and thoughtful opinion, the Second Circuit in US v. [read post]
