Search for: "California v. Rodriguez"
Results 221 - 240
of 438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
Rodriguez, a challenge to the prolonged detention of noncitizens without bond hearings. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:42 am
California, 126 S. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:15 am
Rodriguez, the Nebraska Supreme Court found the case to be most similar to the circumstances in FL v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
Although not directly on point, see Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:16 am
California (1971) (upholding the right to display vulgarities) and Cantwell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 9:44 am
This means that the nearly 2 million undocumented immigrants currently living in California can no longer be discriminated against in civil courts when they are injured or killed. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
The court also denied summary judgment to the employee on her class claims that Taco Bell improperly failed to factor the value of the discounted meals into employees’ regular rate of pay (Rodriguez v Taco Bell, October 23, 2014, Boone, S). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:02 pm
" Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:12 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
” Monasky v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
McMahon and Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
Today the Supreme Court will hear Jennings v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
Bank v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:49 am
As I’ve often said before, if it were up to me, I’d have the executive branch pick judges with legislative confirmation, followed by a California-style retention election every few years in which there would be an up or down vote on the incumbent. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am
At Take Care, Brianne Gorod argues that the oral argument in Janus v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:12 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 9:16 am
A federal antitrust class action pending against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California called Rodriguez, et. al v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm
The Motion was originally introduced in 2019 by Councilmembers Blumenfield and Rodriguez. [read post]
