Search for: "California v. Singh"
Results 81 - 100
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am
Amar concludes that even if the Court “finds no sponsor standing in federal court, how broadly available same-sex marriage will be in California might still take some time to sort out. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
Kaplan’s 61-page opinion permits the suit brought by Carroll, who has accused Trump of raping her in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman in the 1990s, to continue in federal court A judge in California dismissed the defam [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:57 pm
AGGREGATORS MAY FREELY REPRODUCE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS - On February 5th, 2009, the California Court of Appeals for the Sixth Appellate District released its decision in California first Amendment Coalition v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Singh v Weayou heard 18 to 20 July 2017 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:03 am
Holder, by Tejinder Singh, Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:00 am
Petrella v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
The California-based 9th U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:23 pm
FINRA Fines Rodman & Renshaw $315,000 for Supervisory and Information Barrier Violations; Former Chief Compliance Officer and Two Research Analysts Sanctioned, FINRA, August 22, 2012 Two Investment Advisors Convicted in California of High Yield Investment Fraud, US DOJ, August 28, 2012 SEC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
The petition asked whether the California Supreme Court violates the First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances by barring prisoners represented in name only from making pro se filings. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Veden, Univ of Arkansas, Fayetteville: The Alchemy and Antirrhetic of West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
Wu, Loyola Law School Los Angeles, University of Colorado Law School, ACLU of Northern California and Yeshiva University – Benjamin N. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearing in media law cases are outstanding: Wright v Granath, heard 15 October 2020 (Moylan, Singh and Popplewell LJJ) B.C.Strategy UK Ltd v Keshet Broadcasting Ltd heard 17 November 2020 (Saini J). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Representative actions under California’s Private Attorneys General Act will be exempt from arbitration because the Court denied cert. in CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC v. [read post]
