Search for: "California v. Steward"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2021, 6:20 am
District Judge James V. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:21 pm
They infuriated a who’s who of California’s longest-serving stewards of coastal preservation and access, along with hordes of public officials, current and former Coastal Commission staff, and former commissioners and citizens who had traveled from up and down the coast to speak glowingly of Lester’s integrity and... [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 1:37 pm
But the racing stewards then decided that Rosario was also entitled to $110,000 (a "double jockey fee") for being removed. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 9:44 pm
Last Friday, in Plotnik v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:43 am
Steward, 2017 U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
I’m now going to tell you about the 12-hour California Coastal Commission meeting I sat through Wednesday in Morro Bay. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
The opening paragraphs follow:"In my employment discrimination course, I use Diaz v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm
(Evans v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
The court distinguishes Lemmon v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 11:08 am
“To be sure, the judiciary and the lawyers have an obligation to be stewards of CJA funds. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:51 pm
Maywood Glass Co v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
UNITE HERE Local 100 v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:16 am
California v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 10:45 am
.)United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
It's simply unclear from my reading of the motions to dismiss whether Steward has mounted an argument that will prevail. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
A federal district court in California held that triable fact issues existed as to whether he was qualified for any of the four potential positions, whether his employer could have invoked the “special situations” provision of the union contract to override the seniority system, and whether it failed to engage in the interactive process by having only one meeting with him and interviewing him for only one job (Smith v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:45 am
" Letter Carriers v. [read post]
