Search for: "California v. Stout" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 1:46 pm by Chad Flanders
              There is a similar kind of rhetorical disconnect when Stout discusses the case of Robert DiBlasi, a person who, as a result of stealing a package of batteries was sentenced (in California, home of Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:52 am
California Appellate Districts, April 16, 2009 World Fin. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
No party, however, explains why California law should apply to this question. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
District Court for the Eastern District of New York found that allegations a drug company offered inducements “to physicians quite openly” cut against an inference of scienter.[17] The Central District of California, in Gharibian v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
On 10 May 2023, the Court of Appeal (Peter Jackson, Males and Arnold LJJ) heard an appeal in the case of Stoute v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services1961 Stout Street -- Room 1426 FOBDenver, CO 80294-3538Voice Phone (303)844-2024FAX (303)844-2025TDD (303)844-3439Region IX - San Francisco (American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada)Michael Kruley, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:44 am by Eric Fruits
The amicus brief concludes that the 5th Circuit panel wrongly upheld the statute by incorrectly interpreting the same court’s May 2022 ruling in Jarkesy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm by Ben Sperry
California); anonymously hand out leaflets (1995’s McIntyre v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:01 pm by Ken
In Aggravation: V. snarky assholes. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Taylor Gulatsi
Since its initiation, we have hosted special appearances from law libraries in California (late 2022), New York, Minnesota, Virginia, Georgia, and Wisconsin (during 2023). [read post]