Search for: "California v. Whitaker" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2023, 10:59 am by Stuart Tubis
But buried deep inside these cases you will find reference to Doran v. 7‐Eleven, 524 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am by Richard Hunt
The cost of default Brian Whitaker, Pl., v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Richard Hunt
At least some lower California courts have agreed, but in Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE and the Politics of Supply and Demand… [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am by Richard Hunt
Once you leave California, default starts to look like an even better strategy, as shown in Caplan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm by Richard Hunt
Judge Olguin did the same thing to a different plaintiff in Whitaker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm by Richard Hunt
Oct. 20, 2020), Brian Whitaker v. 1810 Downtown Rest., Corp., et al,  2020 WL 6493748, at *5 (C.D. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Anne Joseph O'Connell
(The GAO missed some of this precision in its opinion: Appendix 1 described this latter category as “President directs career official,” but as we saw when Matthew Whitaker was acting attorney general, it also includes political officials.) [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:46 am by Richard Hunt
Sept. 16, 2019) proves that default may be an even better strategy outside of California. [read post]