Search for: "California v. Whitaker" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2013, 8:00 am by Venkat
CVS CaremarkMen's Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute -- Boorstein v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:08 pm by Venkat
CVS Caremark Men's Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute -- Boorstein v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:25 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Recently I was delighted to discover that Irving Younger’s legendary lecture, The Ten Commandments of Cross Examination, is available on YouTube, courtesy of the University of California Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
 Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:35 pm by Venkat
CVS CaremarkMen's Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute -- Boorstein v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Richard Hunt
At least some lower California courts have agreed, but in Martinez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:51 am by Venkat
CeridianFirst Circuit Rejects Data Insecurity Claims on the Basis of Article III Standing--Katz v PershingNew Essay: The Irony of Privacy Class Action LawsuitsAnother Data Loss Case Tossed on Article III Grounds--Whitaker v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Whitaker, No. 08-1259 Conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed over objection that the gun should have been suppressed as the result of a vehicle search for which police lacked reasonable suspicion. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm by Richard Hunt
Oct. 20, 2020), Brian Whitaker v. 1810 Downtown Rest., Corp., et al,  2020 WL 6493748, at *5 (C.D. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:31 am by Venkat
CVS CaremarkMen's Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute -- Boorstein v. [read post]