Search for: "California v. Woods"
Results 41 - 60
of 596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2018, 9:59 am
LEXIS 25916 (ND OH, Feb. 16, 2018), an Ohio federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was transferred out of the faith-based prison unit.In Woods v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
Woods (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 862, 873 (Miller); see also Noel, supra, 17 Cal.App.5th at p. 1324, Sotelo, supra, 207 Cal.App.4th at p. 648; Reyes v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 11:04 am
In City of Goleta v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm
California resists idea of charging market-clearing rate for water — too much like economics — and instead encourages tattling on neighbors [New York Times, Coyote] Academia smitten by notion of “climate reparations” [Peter Wood, Minding the Campus] Costly market intervention: “Minnesota doubles down on nation’s top biodiesel law” [Watchdog] Reusable grocery bags have their problems for sanitation and otherwise, but… [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:50 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes previews Wood v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 10:52 am
In Ali v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
In Barbara O’Neil, et al., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
In Barbara O’Neil, et al., v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
In a per curiam opinion (Felkner v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:40 am
Woods’s lawyers argue that his intelligence scores are low enough that he should be spared because of the Supreme Court ban in Atkins v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
California, 126 S. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:58 am
Wood, earlier here, here, and here] Also on the topic of jury nullification, is that an appropriate metaphor for things happening with the Senate and impeachment? [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:26 pm
In Woods v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:12 pm
Woods’s lawyers argued that his intelligence scores were low enough that he should be spared because of the Supreme Court ban in Atkins v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
Moreover, it and it takes Justice Woods a long time to get to the point. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 12:41 pm
This test was formulated by the California Supreme Court in Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 12:41 pm
This test was formulated by the California Supreme Court in Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:10 pm
The case is discussed here for informational purposes only.Woods v. [read post]
