Search for: "Callahan v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
  The United States as amicus will  be represented by David O’Neil, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
In a brief order, the Court dismissed the appeal in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 4:46 am
United States, Civil Action No. 06-1824(EGS), 2007 U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm by Jon Sands
United States, 134 S. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
That's no excuse at all; when the United States Attorney endows lawyers with the powers of federal prosecutors, he has a responsibility to properly train and supervise them so as to avoid trampling defendants' rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Under the DACA program, they are permitted to remain in the United States for some period of time as long as they meet certain conditions. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am by Katie Bart
Credit: Reuters In the United States, police violence frequently dominates the news cycle. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested, incarcerated, and criminally prosecuted for engaging in constitutionally protected free speech and was detained and arrested without probable cause in violation of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the denial of leave to proceed anonymously in a case implicating possession of marijuana. [read post]