Search for: "Callan v. State" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:20 pm by WSLL
Taylor, Student Director, and Callan E. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
  The 8th District provides the answer last week in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by WSLL
Taylor, Student Director, and Callan Riedel, Student Intern. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Flynn, and Chuck Callan, Broadridge, on Thursday, February 9, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Corporate governance, ESG, Proxy voting, Say on pay, SEC Outlook for Activism in 2023 Posted by James E. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Flynn, and Chuck Callan, Broadridge, on Thursday, February 9, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Corporate governance, ESG, Proxy voting, Say on pay, SEC Outlook for Activism in 2023 Posted by James E. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the federal district court in Delaware granted the employer’s motion on his ADA claim despite the suspicious one-person RIF and the city’s lack of investigation into his FMLA complaint, because there was no indication that his demotion or discharge were due to his disability (Callan v City of Dover, August 26, 2014, Andrews, R). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:09 pm by Nate Russell
In Queen Victoria’s early reign, the courts grappled with the “public inconvenience”—as one judge mildly put it [Mortimer v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
Although reluctant at first, DDA Mark Callan, Judge Carmichael’s best friend, is finally convinced to go ahead. [read post]