Search for: "Camden v. Camden" Results 1 - 20 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 2:10 am by sally
Camden London Borough Council v Stafford [2012] EWCA Civ 839; [2012] WLR (D) 184 “A notice under section 128 of the Housing Act 1996 seeking an order for possession of a dwelling let under an introductory tenancy could not be conditional. [read post]
On August 6, 2021, the New Jersey District Court (Camden) denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment in Calio v. [read post]
On August 6, 2021, the New Jersey District Court (Camden) denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment in Calio v. [read post]
On August 6, 2021, the New Jersey District Court (Camden) denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment in Calio v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Daily Record Staff
Contracts — Breach — Unjust enrichment This case arises out of an action filed in the Circuit Court for Frederick County by appellant, 301-303 North Market Street, LLC (“North Market”), against appellees, Camden, LLC, William Camden, and Boaz Yavnai (collectively the “Contractors”). [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:06 am
Halabi (A Bankrupt) v Camden London Borough Council and another; [2008] WLR (D) 46 “The court had no jurisdiction to annul a bankruptcy order on the basis of an undertaking from the bankrupt's solicitor to pay the debts, costs and expenses of the bankruptcy. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
Chandler v Camden London Borough Council; Chandler v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2009] EWHC 219 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 58 “A parent of school age children could not be classed as an ‘economic operator’ and did not therefore have sufficient standing under European and domestic rules on public procurement to bring a [...] [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:55 am
Halabi (a Bankrupt) v Camden London Borough Council and Another Chancery Division “The current practice in some county courts of annulling a bankruptcy order, on the basis of an undertaking from the bankrupt's solicitor to pay the debts, costs and expenses of the bankruptcy, was not within the jurisdiction of the court. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am by Matthew Flinn
Voyias v Information Commissioner and the London Borough of Camden EA/2011/0007 – Read Judgment The First Tier Tribunal has overturned a decision of the Information Commissioner and ordered Camden Council to provide information about empty properties in the borough to a former member of the Advisory Service for Squatters. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:12 am by sally
Sharif v Camden London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 463; [2011] WLR (D) 148“A local housing authority’s duty under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996 to secure that accommodation was available for occupation by a homeless applicant was not discharged by providing two self-contained flats with no shared communal living areas, one for occupation by the applicant and her sister and the other for occupation by her father, because such accommodation was not available… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:29 am by sally
Mitu v Camden London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1249; [2011] WLR (D) 310 “Where a local authority, having decided that an applicant was intentionally homeless and not in priority need, decided on review of the application that the applicant’s homelessness was not intentional, it had a duty by section 192(2) of the Housing Act 1996 to provide or arrange for the provision of advice and assistance, and a discretion by section 192(3) of the 1996 Act to provide… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:28 am
Visiting Assistant Professor Rutgers-Camden Law Rutgers-Camden Law seeks one or two Visiting Assistant Professors for the 2009-2010 Academic Year. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Texas Law, Business, and Economics Dan Rodriguez (Texas Law) Touro Sandy V. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:15 am
Candidus Dougherty, Rutgers School of Law, Camden, has published Viacom International, Inc., et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:32 am by tortsprof
Jay Feinman & Caitlin Edwards (Rutgers-Camden) have posted to SSRN Henningsen v. [read post]