Search for: "Campbell v Murray"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Yours faithfully Solicitors David Jockelson Miles and Partners Kate Hammond Miles and partners Sarah Cove Miles and Partners Amanda Dench Miles and Partners Pauline Lloyd Ewings & Co Peggy Ray Goodman Ray Gwen Williams Goodman Ray Hilka Hollmann Goodman Ray Joanna Bosanquet Goodman Ray Michael Bourdages Goodman Ray Christina Blacklaws TV Edwards David Emmerson T V Edwards Lorraine Green TV Edwards Susan Fitzgerald TV Edwards Valerie Greenfield Fisher Meredith LLP… [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:41 pm
The case was Flood v Times Newspaper and, thankfully, the judges reinforced the responsible journalism defence in defamation. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:52 am
In yesterday’s case (Campbell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
In Simao v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:26 am
The leading authority on privacy under the Convention is still Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, according to which the applicant had a reasonable expectation of privacy both in relation to the explicit sexual photographs which she had taken for transmission to her boyfriend and also of the images taken of family and friends. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:50 am
The leading authority on privacy under the Convention is still Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd (2004) UKHL 22, according to which the applicant had a reasonable expectation of privacy both in relation to the explicit sexual photographs which she had taken for transmission to her boyfriend and also of the images taken of family and friends. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
Levy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
On Twitter, Campbell said: “Genuinely shocked someone has seen fit to leak my statement to Leveson. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am
Campbell) Order Setting Rule 16 Case Management Conference (Magistrate Judge David K. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” He cited four privacy cases – McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73; HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] Ch 57; Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103; and Murray v Express Newspapers [2009] Ch 481 – where the House of Lords had refused to grant permission to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
This test assesses “whether a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities, if placed in the same situation as the subject of the disclosure, rather than the recipient, would find the disclosure offensive” (in Campbell v MGN Ltd ([2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Campbell v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am
Our right to free expression has a natural tension with our right to privacy – see Von Hannover, Campbell v MGN or Mosley v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
This is an objective question, which should be formulated, according to Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) at [35] as follows: “The question is what a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities would feel if she was placed in the same position as the claimant and faced with the same publicity” (Campbell v MGN at [99]). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:21 am
Murray Snow. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 am
Lord Walker then considers the issue of photographs, referring to the Campbell, Murray and Von Hannover cases. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) – and that Mr Justice Eady was not party to a single one of these decisions (although appeals against his rulings were dismissed in McKennitt and Lord Browne). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
