Search for: "Campbell v Murray" Results 61 - 74 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
 Since the coming into force of the HRA and the designation of breach of confidence as the appropriate vehicle for the recognition of individuals’ Article 8 ECHR privacy rights in the form of the new tort of misuse of private information (Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22), the court’s power to grant an interim injunction in any case where the ‘relief … if granted, might affect the exercise of the Convention right to freedom of expression’ has… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
Baroness Hale and others of course rejected such a notion obiter in Campbell and the High Court in the JK Rowling (Murray v Express Newspapers) case struck out JK Rowling’s claim on behalf of her young son after she was photographed in the street in Edinburgh, pushing him in his pram. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457),  McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73),  Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:24 am by Andres
Mensing, pp.166-184 The Online Public or Cybercitizen, Andrew Power, pp.185-195 In Case of Emergency Only: The Difficult Role of Ethics in Small Biotechnological Companies Michael Steinmann and Thomas Potthast, pp.196-203 Reports The Health Law Institute, Tracey M Bailey, pp.204-209 Report on the Technoscience and Regulation Research Unit (TRRU) and the Qualitative Research Commons and Studio (QuRCS), Emily Uhrig, pp.210-215 Book Reviews Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia:… [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
RETAIL CONSIGNEES FOR FSIS RECALL 034-2009 (EXPANDED) FSIS has reason to believe that the following retail location(s) received assorted beef products that have been recalled by JBS Swift Beef Company. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:45 pm
The new judge is Lord Malcolm who, under his maiden name of Colin Campbell QC, was Senior Counsel for Norton in the patent infringement action of Organon v Norton joined with the Petition of Arrow Generics for revocation of the Tibolone patents (see IPKat note here). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
They are * Murray v Express Newspapers plc (noted by the IPKat here), the Court of Appeal for England and Wales ruling that seeks to establish a balance between the privacy-friendly European Court of Human Rights' ruling in Von Hannover and the rather more press-tolerant House of Lords ruling in the Naomi Campbell case and * Rolawn Ltd v Turfmech Machinery Ltd, a Patents Court for England and Wales decision on the subsistence of both registered and… [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 3:11 am
Murray failed to present available defenses that were likely to change the outcome of the trial. [read post]