Search for: "Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v Lynn Goldsmith concerned the aforementioned iconic art of Andy Warhol, namely his lithographs of the music artist Prince. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v Lynn Goldsmith concerned the aforementioned iconic art of Andy Warhol, namely his lithographs of the music artist Prince. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 5:26 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., a work is transformative if it alters the original work by adding "new expression, meaning, or message. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:20 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994); Dr. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:29 am by Scott Hervey
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc, “the more transformative the new work, the less will be the significance of other factors, … that may weigh against a finding of fair use. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
” But it follows this with a recitation of the above language from Campbell without a word more. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Ben
 Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]