Search for: "Campbell v. Associated Press" Results 1 - 20 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It can also be seen in any other cases, including, more recently, the Court of Appeal decision in AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2013] EWCA Civ 554), which concerned an article about the identity of AAA’s father. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
A recent decision by Nicol J in ERY v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2016] EWHC 2760 (QB)) has found that a suspect in a police investigation has a reasonable expectation of privacy which is likely to trump the press’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Instead of proceeding with a disciplinary hearing, Campbell and her union, New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association [PBA] “settled” the matter by agreeing to have Campbell serve a “one-year disciplinary probationary period. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Misuse of private information was recognised as a cause of action in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 and is now firmly established in English law. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:37 am by Aidan Wills
Both Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN are leapfrog appeals from the High Court. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  The proposed tort bears close comparison to the UK’s misuse of private information action, developed from Campbell v MGN ([2004] AC 457). [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
The requirements for this action include 1) the information was private, 2) the receiver of the information knew, or ought to have known, that the information would reasonably be regarded as private, and 3) the information was used without authorisation to the detriment of the party communicating it (see Campbell v MGN [2004] UKHL 22). [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:25 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The Associated Press, 09-cv-01123, U.S. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am by INFORRM
  This test assesses “whether a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities, if placed in the same situation as the subject of the disclosure, rather than the recipient, would find the disclosure offensive” (in Campbell v MGN Ltd ([2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  The High Court recently adopted such an approach in AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 2103 (QB). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
It took Louise and Brian Farmer (Press Association) over a year to be able to write those stories. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:48 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on the class-action case Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
The Court finished up its October sitting yesterday, beginning with oral arguments in the class-action case Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]