Search for: "Campbell v. Bender" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:28 am
"Defendant's first counterclaim for malpractice should have been dismissed since she failed to demonstrate that she would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action for divorce but for plaintiff's negligence (Maillet v Campbell, 280 AD2d 526, 527 [2001]). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
They are * Murray v Express Newspapers plc (noted by the IPKat here), the Court of Appeal for England and Wales ruling that seeks to establish a balance between the privacy-friendly European Court of Human Rights' ruling in Von Hannover and the rather more press-tolerant House of Lords ruling in the Naomi Campbell case and * Rolawn Ltd v Turfmech Machinery Ltd, a Patents Court for England and Wales decision on the subsistence of both registered and unregistered design… [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
Bender | Medium (pointing out reasons why “training” is an imperfect metaphor that may overly anthropomorphize the software tools) [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Eleonora Rosati
One senses that Recorder Douglas Campbell QC thought this a bit of try on when he commented “The defendants did not dispute that the consequences of their argument were to create what the claimants had called a "brand new torpedo", nor that this was a torpedo which never previously appears to hav [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Co. v Campbell (538 US 408 [2003]), and Gomez v Cabatic (159 AD3d 62 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 7:41 am by Andrei Mincov
Recently I wrote a 100-page comparative research paper on the treatment of parody in the copyright laws of common law countries and selected European countries. [read post]