Search for: "Campbell v. Coats" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aziz v Aziz & Ors Rev 1 [2007] EWCA Civ 712 (11 July 2007) Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 688 (11 July 2007) Adelson & Anor v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [2007] EWCA Civ 701 (09 July 2007) MM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 687 (06 July 2007) Togher v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
’s Introduction: “Alabama Legal History as a Field of Study”Warren Hoffman: “Developments of the Enclosure Movement in Alabama: Disrupting the Free Roaming”Paul Rand: “Flush Times in the Chancery: A Brief Note on the History of Equity and Trusts”Helen Eckinger: “The Militarization of the University of Alabama”Eddie Lowe: “Economic Growth in Blount County: Attorneys, Companies, and Cases”Mike Dodson: “Pioneers in Alabama Legal… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:14 am by Dianne Saxe
In Muskoka Fuels v Hassan Steel Fabricators, the plaintiff petroleum distributor purchased a fuel tank manufactured by Hassan. [read post]
27 May 2012, 12:26 pm
So she was very interested to hear that Recorder Douglas Campbell, sitting in the Patents County Court, England and Wales, had given judgment in a moral rights case on 18 May 2012 in Emma Delves-Broughton v House of Harlot. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am by Maya Angenot
She also cited the 1917 Ontario Court of Appeal judgment of Campbell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am by Marie Louise
(IP Osgoode) Patent Pilot Program (Docket Report) Design Patents (Inventive Step)   US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Marine Polymer and Section 112 rejections in reexamination: Nissim v Time Warner (WHDA) ITC issues notice of final determination finding s 337 violation in Certain Ink Cartridges With Printheads (337-TA-723) (ITC 337 Law Blog) District Court Arizona: Judge Campbell denies prosecution bar in reexamination: NeXedge v. [read post]