Search for: "Campbell v. Dept. of Civil Service"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2008, 8:30 pm
New York State Dept. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
See also, Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27 (1st Dept 2000), Iv denied 95 NY2d 759, cert denied sub nom Dim v Snyder, 531 US 1158 (2001); Finkelstein v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It held that contrary to Matter of Barbara T. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
Pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant now moves for a new trial as a matter of right within thirty days (30) of the judgment, and thus within the court’s plenary power. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
Dept. of Child Services, and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Secretary, Dept. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:42 pm
Dept. of Child Svcs. and Child Adv. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
See, e.g., Campbel, aka Skywalker, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pension* December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript here* SCOTUS docket herean>* SCOTUSWIKI hereAwaiting ArgumentGross v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
, 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987), thus establishing that the student loans at issue are dischargeable.Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable by Bankruptcy Rule 7056 [dkt. 33]. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
http://j.st/GMA Campbell v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
State Dept. of Corrections, 53 P.3d 1115, 1124 n.38 (Alaska 2002); Laznovsky v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972) ("there is no privilege. . . in an action in which the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of the patient"); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
