Search for: "Cann v. Cann"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2019, 1:58 am
In other contexts (I’m thinking here of land registration cases like Cann), the courts take that point. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:58 am
In Inhale, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 8:12 am
Cann v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 9:42 am
Cann v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
A new paper | In memoriam of Kenneth Jay Lane: "My designs are all original"; "original from someone" | French Commercial Tribunal: clarity in paternity is key Never Too Late 156 [week ending Sunday 16 July] A film is a film is a film: at Cannes, it's not that simple | BGH grants compulsory license in preliminary proceedings | An improved Improver? [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:10 pm
Image credits: Cecilia Sbrolli PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 156 [week ending Sunday 16 July] A film is a film is a film: at Cannes, is not that simple | BGH grants compulsory license in preliminary proceedings | An improved improver? [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
Joa, Inc. v Fameccanica Data SpA [2017] EWHC 1251 (IPEC), particularly considering the new trend to include added matter in the pleading point of patent cases.SugarHero and the Snow Globe Cupcakes - Copyright and Food VideosMathildelets us know about the recent filing of a copyright infringement claim by internet chef Elizabeth LaBau (known as SugarHero) against Television Food Network, relating to LaBau's cooking video of her flagship recipe “Snow Globe Cupcakes”.Mr… [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:30 pm
SALINGER v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
”, Guest Kat Stephen Jones shares his insights on Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
A word copy of the judgment is downloadable here case-of-mc-cann-v2-the-united-kingdom. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
According to some, this would amount to trade mark “genericide” but as InternKat Cecilia tells us, A googol of generic questions in Ninth Circuit's Elliott v Google decision were raised in this subject, ultimately deciding that the Google trade mark is still alive and well.Life as a Kat: gotta love those summer afternoon napsIn the seventh episode of the Life as an IP lawyer series, the AmeriKat brought us to Sydney, Australia to meet Wen Wu of Gilbert + Tobin. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
According to some, this would amount to trade mark “genericide” but as InternKat Cecilia tells us, A googol of generic questions in Ninth Circuit's Elliott v Google decision were raised in this subject, ultimately deciding that the Google trade mark is still alive and well.Life as a Kat: gotta love those summer afternoon napsIn the seventh episode of the Life as an IP lawyer series, the AmeriKat brought us to Sydney, Australia to meet Wen Wu of Gilbert + Tobin. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Per Lord Oliver in Abbey National BS v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Per Lord Oliver in Abbey National BS v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
A new paper | In memoriam of Kenneth Jay Lane: "My designs are all original"; "original from someone" | French Commercial Tribunal : clarity in paternity is key Never Too Late 156 [week ending Sunday 16 July] A film is a film is a film: at Cannes, it's not that simple | BGH grants compulsory license in preliminary proceedings | An improved Improver? [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:38 am
"The Garner Transcripts: That v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:28 am
There was some discussion as to whether there were two transactions (transfer to Mrs D, then mortgage) or one (on the principle of Abbey National Building Society v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56, but of course either transaction taken individually or both taken together involved one and one only recipient of the purchase money. [read post]
