Search for: "Capital Communications, Inc. v. F. C. C" Results 121 - 140 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: New record for international trade mark registrations in 2008 but signs of slowdown at year end and possible negative annual income (WIPO) (IP Frontline) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Chile and Peru join PCT (IP tango) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) Community trade mark fees to be reduced (Class 46)… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
To Egilman, it was obvious that material forces of capitalism meant that manufacturing industry was incapable of honestly defending its products. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:06 pm by Alex Gasser
Patent No. 6,094,575 did not disclose the first, third, and fourth steps of claim 1, or steps (b), (c), and (f)-(h) of claim 12. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The final rules make a Federal Communications Commission-related exception to disclosure,[17] but no similar exception applies for breaches of private health information.[18] While the Commission’s responsibility is to ensure that investors receive timely, material information, it sometimes has to defer to other government agencies with overarching mandates to protect national security, public safety, and critical infrastructure.[19] Harming Investors Although citing investor… [read post]