Search for: "Capitol Records, Inc. v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:51 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:29 am
Image via CrunchBaseThe United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has weighed in on the epic three-year litigation war between the Recording Industry Association of America ("RIAA") and Minnesotan Jammie Thomas-Rasset, whose love of sharing copyrighted songs on the defunct KaZaA is going to cost her $220,000.In Capitol Records, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:36 am
" The case cite is Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
Records, Inc., and UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
Realty One (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Capital Records – Labels, government oppose Thomas-Rasset’s attempt to avoid third trial (Copyrights & Copyrights) Capitol Records – Jammie Thomas’ third P2P trial looms; RIAA complains about cost (Ars Technica) Capitol Records – Judge Davis refuses request for… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court: IFPI loses ‘deep-linking’ case against Baidu (TorrentFreak) (IP Dragon) (Ars Technica) (China Hearsay) District Court Minnesota slashes ‘monstrous’ P2P award by 97% to $54,000: Capitol Records Inc. et al v Jammie… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:31 pm
Nesson admitted pro hac vice: Capitol v Thomas-Rasset (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:16 am
(Inand Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
”21 The district court in the famous Jammie Thomas-Rasset case considered whether merely “making available” song files in a peer-to-peer share folder violated plaintiffs’ exclusive right “to authorize” distributions. [read post]