Search for: "Cardona v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Toledo-Cardona, No. 14-163 (lower court opinion here: http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/11thcir-toledo-cardona.pdf). [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:58 pm
The facts in Blake v Massachusetts Mut. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 8:58 am
The facts in Blake v Massachusetts Mut. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Toledo-Cardona, 14-163. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Toledo-Cardona. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Toledo-Cardona, 14-163. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Teo v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
§ 2254(d)(1), that where a state appellate court concludes certain pretrial statements should have been excluded from the prosecution’s case under Miranda v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
FULLER, Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:15 pm
See, People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:09 pm
Similarly, in People v Cardona, the Appellate Division, First Department, addressed the issue of whether, on the basis of defendant's Rhode Island conviction for burglary, he was properly adjudicated a second felony offender for purposes of sentencing in New York. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Calderon-Cardona, et al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:56 am
Cardona has been seeking a pardon that would allow him to return to the United States from Mexico. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
The Presiding Justice of New York State's intermediate appeals [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:43 pm
Anthony V. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
I. v New York City Bd. of Educ., 256 AD2d 189; McDonald v Cook, 252 AD2d 302; and Lemp v Lewis, 226 AD2d 907, in support of its ruling. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:57 am
Diversity education effort results in allegations of “intentional infliction of emotional distress”Graham v Guilderland CSD, App. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
” Judge Cardona also cited Lake v Regan [supra] in support of his position. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:36 am
The trial is State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:40 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that “The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law… [read post]
