Search for: "Carer v. Wells" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2015, 1:18 pm by Dave
 And that must be how the Court felt in Sanneh v SSWP and others [2015] EWCA Civ 49, which concerns the eligibility rules for Zambrano carers of a raft of social assistance benefits. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 3:17 pm by familoo
But then I am a bear of very little brain (Pooh v popular with the 4 year old at present). [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 3:17 pm by familoo
But then I am a bear of very little brain (Pooh v popular with the 4 year old at present). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm by Giles Peaker
SD v Eastleigh Borough Council (HB) (Housing and council tax benefits : other) [2014] UKUT 325 (AAC) The issue here was whether the appellant met the requirements for an additional bedroom for an overnight carer under Reg B13(6)(a). [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Rutherford & Ors v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions [2014] EWHC 1613 (Admin) This was the Judicial Review, supported by CPAG, of the failure of the bedroom tax regulations to address the position of tenants where a bedroom was needed for overnight carers for a child. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:06 pm by Giles Peaker
R (OAO Yekini) v LB Southwark [2014] EWHC 2096 (Admin)  [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:26 pm by INFORRM
” Her Honour also noted that: “The inquiry currently being undertaken by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Abuse relates to periods well before the employment of the second and third plaintiff, and well before the first plaintiff, which is no longer a part of the Anglican Church but a separate organisation. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am by Rosalind English
With that in mind, a secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
The thorny and increasingly important issue of jurisdiction went before the Court of Appeal earlier this month in Bush v Bush [2008] EWCA Civ 865.The Facts: The parties were married in London in April 1988 and went to live in Tanzania in 1991 or 1992. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:15 am by Lucy
As his carer had earlier feared, ZH jumped into the water. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC) v SSWP… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC) v SSWP… [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
On the Rutherford appeal, as well as the Burnip narrow class issue, there was the further issue of treating children differently (and worse) than adults. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Adam Wagner
G v E & Ors [2010] EWHC 3385 (Fam) (21 December 2010) – Read judgment Manchester City Council has been ordered to pay the full legal costs of a 20-year-old man with severe learning disabilities who was unlawfully removed from his long-term foster carer. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:33 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Even if art 8 interference were established, it would be justified under art 8(2) on the ground that it was necessary for the economic well-being of the local authority and proportionate. [read post]