Search for: "Carey v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 3:39 am
Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, which is reviewing the investigation concluded months ago by the D.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:11 pm
Does 1-4577, one of the mass file sharing "John Doe" cases, involving motion pictures, following the RIAA model, the judge has ruled that the plaintiff is required to show a basis for suing defendants in the District of Columbia court.The ruling came about in the context of an order partially granting plaintiff's motion to extend time to serve defendants.Order partially granting motion for extension of time to make serviceThe defendants who'd opposed the motion… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Here is the abstract: In District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
United StatesCNN v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:48 am
SpainGoogle v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Apr. 16, 2012)), Texas (Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc., Civil Action No. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
British Columbia, by Robert T. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts 1997), the government wanted to use an internal Merrill Lynch E-mail message from Carey to Benjamin Moore, Carey's immediate superior, recounting a conversation with Ferber wherein Ferber inculpated himself. . . . [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Then, eight years later, in Carey v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
For instance, in Carey v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
The District of Columbia is one such city, and among the soldiers sent to DC were National Guard Soldiers from Utah. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The book only says that “on Sunday evening, December 13, Carey sent an email to the team announcing that the decision had been made to go forward. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
Canada On 31 October 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia handed down judgement in favour of the defendants in the case of Seyedalikhani v Mansouri, 2023 BCSC 1902. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Most recently and notably, in 2020, in Kelly v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm
District Court for the Western District of Washington; Mary Saunders of ANSI; Peter L. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Carey, 431 U.S. at 701. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
The Roots of Sexual Privacy: Warren and Brandeis & the Privacy of Intimate Life 42 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 383 (2019), U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-06, Danielle Keats Citron, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Davis and McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]