Search for: "Carl V. Reed"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 12:20 pm
Reed, — N.E.3d —- (2024). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
Carl Malamud speaking at Transform: Justice Friday. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra Natapoff;… [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am
In this episode, you’ll learn about: The prior art, or evidence, of earlier technology that EFF was able to present to courts to prove that the so-called “podcasting patent” was invalid How the landmark Alice v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
The Seventh Circuit’s decision comes in the wake of the recent jury verdict in favor of CVS in the matter of Carl Washington (formerly known as Corcoran) et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 7:00 pm
In the recent decision of Hoeller v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
Texas Food Industry Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:49 am
Arsenal v Reed). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 11:07 am
Reed and Mr. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 1:19 pm
Zigtema, Carl F.A. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:13 pm
*************Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:22 pm
Hatfield, Carl F.A. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:31 pm
Hatfield, Carl F.A. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Lucy Reed at Pink Tape considers a problem which can only get worse: Courts Hit By Disillusioned Litigants? [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
