Search for: "Carling v. Peters"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
Lee Bailey, Carl Douglas, Peter Neyfeld and Gerald F. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Tribe Carl M. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name, was nothing less… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
One of the most notable films entering the public domain on January 1, 2024, is Carl Theodor Dreyer’s silent masterpiece The Passion of Joan of Arc. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Gardner,Peter L. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Peter Austin has shown, by Monte Carlo simulation, that categorizing a continuous variable in a logistic regression results in inflating the rate of finding false positive associations.[11] The type I (false-positive) error rates increases with sample size, with increasing correlation between the confounding variable and outcome of interest, and the number of categories used for the continuous variables. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Even the notorious plaintiffs’ expert witness, Carl Cranor, could muster only a distanced agnosticism: “In Wells v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am
Colo. 2011). [4] Rost v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:13 am
Carl’s Patio, Inc., 992 F. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
& Pol. 135 (2021)).Carl H. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm
Carl Cranor pays me the dubious honor of quoting my assessment of weight of the evidence (WOE) pseudo-methodology as used by lawsuit industry expert witnesses, in one of his recent publications: “Take all the evidence, throw it into the hopper, close your eyes, open your heart, and guess the weight. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
Joining the majority of European courts, the Paris Court of Justice ruled that Eli Lilly’s patent, which relates to the combined administration of pemetrexed disodium and vitamin B12, was infringed by the marketing of Fresenius’ pemetrexed diacid. [read post]
