Search for: "Carmax Auto Superstore "
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC, 246 Cal.App.4th 973 (2016), which was handed down in April. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
CarMax Auto Superstores, LLC, 840 F.3d 644 (9th Cir. 2016). [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
CarMax Auto Superstores California, ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (Jan. 30, 2018), which contains a lengthy and interesting discussion of the CLRA. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
CarMax Auto Superstores California, ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (Jan. 30, 2018), which contains a lengthy and interesting discussion of the CLRA. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
CarMax Auto Superstores, LLC, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
The Montgomery County Auditor’s $1.1 million reduction in the property tax value of a West Carrollton Carmax Auto Superstore was affirmed by the Ohio Supreme Court today. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:27 am
On December 1, 2022, nationwide used car dealer CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:30 pm
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. asserted that it had overpaid an employee, Montgomery Blair Sibley, in the amount of $4.88, and requested repayment. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:47 am
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc., 07-883, 2008 WL 441962 (W.D. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:35 pm
The petition of the day is: CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court: On February 24, 2014, the Court issued a GVR order (grant, vacate and remand) in CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
As if on cue, plaintiffs in a federal putative wage class action against CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC filed new state claims under PAGA, claiming they could not be arbitrated despite being ordered to arbitrate other claims on July 2. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
In CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:56 am
By denying a petition to review in CarMax Auto Superstores California, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:58 am
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., Case No. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:30 am
§ 12-6-2320(A)(4) does not expressly allow use of the combined entity apportionment method; and 3) the SCDOR had never employed this method before.CarMax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
CarMax Auto Superstores Cal. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm
Supreme Court denied certiorari in Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:08 pm
CarMax Auto Superstores, LLC (9th Cir. 2017) 845 F.3d 916, 918 [defendant’s correction offer did not bar plaintiff’s recovery of attorney’s fees where plaintiff sought only injunctive relief for violation of the CLRA].) [read post]
