Search for: "Carr v. Alford"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
As the reader may recall from other “Watch Your Language” articles for this Blog, because of this judicial deference to “commercial language”, you must say what you mean, precisely, or a judge will decide what you meant.Apparently, the plaintiffs in the recent Supreme Court of Ohio case, Alford v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
As the reader may recall from other “Watch Your Language” articles for this Blog, because of this judicial deference to “commercial language”, you must say what you mean, precisely, or a judge will decide what you meant.Apparently, the plaintiffs in the recent Supreme Court of Ohio case, Alford v. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 210 (1962): ‘The nonjusticiability of a political question is primarily a function of the separation of powers. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 am
.* * * * * * *Former Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann entered Alford pleas on Friday to a pair of ethics violations. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
