Search for: "Carr v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
Analogy with Arrow case unhelpful given factual differences between the caseMichael agreed that there are key differences between the facts of Arrow v Merck and the present case - an observation also made by Carr J in his judgment when he sounded a note of caution on the use of the term "Arrow" declarations. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am by Charon QC
A recent Telegraph article on Asbestos claims arising from a landmark legal decision of Sienkiewicz v Greif and Knowsley MBC v Willmore is a case in point. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am by Patricia Salkin
Carr (collectively, Wooster petitioners) and Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc. commenced these CPLR article 78 proceedings seeking to annul the negative declaration issued by respondent City of Buffalo Planning Board under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) with respect to the proposed construction of Queen City Landing in Buffalo’s Outer Harbor area. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:31 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Given that the state has expressly asked the Court to overturn its landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:10 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Federal, and include: United States Code 1925-1988 (includes content up to 1993) From Guide to Law Online: United States Law United States Reports v. 1-542 (1754-2004) From Guide to Law Online: United States Judiciary Code of Federal Regulations (1938-1995) From Guide to Law Online: Executive Federal Register v. 1-58 (1936-1993) From Guide to Law Online: Executive [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:19 am
Carr was not arrested or cited with any offense.The article goes on to state -The practice is perfectly legal. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction) Machiko Kanetake, María de los Ángeles González Carreño v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 Finally, in the peace of a Friday off from work, she has been able to fully digest the decision of Mr Justice Carr in Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology [2016] EWHC 374.What is this case about? [read post]