Search for: "Carr v. State of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2017, 8:20 am
Florida, California, and Arizona are just a few of the states that have initiated efforts to change how redistricting occurs in each state. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am
Carr (1962), recognizing judicial review of legislative apportionment; Engel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Patrick Huston, which “organizes, analyzes and synthesizes all of the 48 UTSA-adopting states’ published court opinions (state and federal). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Rptr. 2d 204 (California Court of Appeals1991). [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm
See McKoy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
It has been a week since the Court announced that it would review United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Carr, it fared poorly on the cert. docket: the Court won’t review Kansas v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
Coker v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Carr, along with the companion case of Kansas v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:55 am
Trademarks * The California Supreme Court denied review in Ison v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Carr and so on. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:48 am
So long as responsible, law-abiding adults may purchase handguns in California, the First Amendment prevents the State from enforcing Section 26820’s ban on on-site handgun advertising. [1] See Bigelow v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
California Teachers Association, a challenge to compulsory fees for public-sector unions, garnered the most attention. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm
Carr (both petitions are titled Kansas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Imburgia 14-462Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
