Search for: "Carr v. State of California"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:27 pm
California would have to follow Texas. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Imburgia 14-462Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:03 am
(There already was a class action of that kind in the late 2000s, but it went nowhere.)Carr v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Patrick Huston, which “organizes, analyzes and synthesizes all of the 48 UTSA-adopting states’ published court opinions (state and federal). [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 11:18 am
Google argues that the class action lawyers went too far, and on that basis has appealed to the Ninth Circuit the district court's decision to certify a consumer class:Ninth Circuit appeal no. 22-80140; Mary Carr, et al v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Imburgia 14-462Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
First, the court held as a matter of law that off-label use was not “medical experimentation” under a California statute, but it was just getting warmed up. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:19 am
Carr cited the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:23 am
The second prong of Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
The ruling in Carr v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
” Last week’s other two rescheduled cases, Carr v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:50 am
District Court for the Northern District of California, requesting it to set the terms for a global FRAND-licence. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
(collectively, “Shasta”) appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Plaintiffs LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. and LifeScan, Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Carr, 14-449, and Kansas v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Iskanian, 14-341 allows us to linger a bit longer in California. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Opinion below (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of the United States Supplemental brief of respondent Docket: 08-1301 Title: Carr v. [read post]
