Search for: "Carroll v. Action Enterprises, Inc." Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 1:52 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Octogenarian pornographer and libertine Hugh Hefner wants to take Playboy Enterprises, Inc. private. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
Carroll    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitSUTTON, Circuit Judge. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Chelsea, MA; David Alberts, President) Aco Communications Company (Billerica, MA; Alexis Cruz, President) Action Learning, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
  Petitioner’s reply (forthcoming)   Kansas City Premier Apartments, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am by Richard Hunt
Flourshings Plus, Inc., d/b/a the Tom Cat Bar & Grill,  2019 WL 1958284 (S.D. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
After trial, the Court addressing both claims held that (i) citing In re Tele-Communications, Inc. and Levco v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]