Search for: "Carroll v. Carroll" Results 181 - 200 of 1,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 8:49 am by Daily Record Staff
Wolcott (“the Wolcotts”), appeal the Circuit Court for Carroll County’s July 17, 2015, decision and declaration of rights regarding the validity and scope of an easement encumbering their property. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:13 am by Daily Record Staff
Civil judgment — Promissory note — Enforcement In Appeal No. 2269, September Term, 2014, Edwin Bell and Miranda Bell (“the Bells”), appellants, argue that we should reverse a judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Carroll County in favor of Dyck-O=Neal, Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:01 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure action — Motion to dismiss In October 2016, appellees, acting as substitute trustees,1 filed an Order to Docket, in the Circuit Court for Carroll County, seeking to foreclose on real property owned by Ryan Hewett, appellant. [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:33 pm by Daily Record Staff
(“Dyck”), obtained a money judgment against appellants Edwin and Miranda Bell in the Circuit Court for Carroll County. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Carroll v Kynaston [2010] EWCA Civ 1404 (13 December 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Smith v ADVFN Plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) (13 December 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Public Interest Lawyers v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 3277 (Admin) (13 December 2010) High Court (Patents Court) Pfizer Health AB & Anor v Schwarz Pharma AG & Ors [2010] EWHC 3236 (Pat) (08 December… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:23 am by Daily Record Staff
Motor torts — Insurance coverage — Legal owner of vehicle On April 7, 2009, Par Vending Company employee Edward Calwell was driving the company delivery van southbound on Maryland Route 91 in Carroll County when he lost control of the vehicle. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:05 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Carroll v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Simon Gibbs
Although the issue, inexplicably, still sometimes arises, it should now be clear (post-Kynaston v Carroll [2011] EWHC 2179) that they can appear at (first-instance) detailed assessment hearings so long as they are properly instructed by the legal representative on record. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:28 am by PaulKostro
CARROLL, J.S.C., December 3, 2010: Under New Jersey law an engagement ring is deemed a conditional gift so that the ring is returnable if the engagement is broken. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 3:30 am by Dara E. Purvis
She traces a shift in the anti-abortion movement’s tactics after Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 10:16 am
Carroll, 127 Ariz. 398, 621 P.2d 307 (1980) holds no; Campbell v. [read post]