Search for: "Carter's Contracting Services Inc" Results 81 - 90 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
State Farm, based in Bloomington, Illinois, and Los Angeles-based Farmers Group Inc., the third-largest home insurer in the U.S., also hired McKinsey as a consultant, court records show. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:24 am by Jon L. Gelman
  Local 47 of the Service, Hospital, Nursing Home and Public Employees Union attempted to organize the workers at Copeland Oakes, Inc., a retirement home in Ohio. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge David Carter’s ruling came as he ordered the release to a House select committee of 101 emails from Trump ally John Eastman, rejecting Eastman’s effort to shield them via attorney-client privilege. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Hutchinson, then a practicing lawyer, was paid monthly retainers that nominally were for legal services. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 22 March 2023, the defendant’s application for summary judgement was dismissed in the case of Frati v Bowen-Carter [2023] EWHC 627 (KB). [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Postal Service’s governing board, the independent body responsible for evaluating DeJoy’s performance. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:06 pm by Steven M. Taber
– EPA Press Release, October 7, 2010 The Municipality of Anchorage, Kincaid Project Group, Land Design North and Roger Hickel Contracting, Inc., have agreed to complete the clean up of lead-contaminated soil at Kincaid Park in Anchorage, Alaska under a settlement announced today by the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Amgen, Inc., No. 07-1999 "In an action against defendant charging fraudulent pricing of pharmaceutical drugs in violation of Wisconsin state law, an order remanding the case and sanctioning defendant is affirmed in part as to the remand order, but reversed as to the sanctions where: 1) the filing of a suit under the False Claims Act did not render this case removable; and 2) the paucity of appellate authority on the removability issue gave defendant a reasonable basis for removing the… [read post]