Search for: "Carter, Appeal of"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Appeals Court Upholds Conviction of GOP Operative Who Steered Russian Money to Trump Camp Yahoo News – Kyle Cheney (Politico) | Published: 4/19/2024 A federal appeals court upheld the conviction of campaign operative Jesse Benton for steering an illegal Russian contribution to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:44 am
Carter has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:11 am
CARTER, 2024-NCCOA-______ (2024). [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 9:58 am
Mr Lowe appealed just about everything. i) Was the prescribed information given in full? [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:38 pm
“ The post “What’s at stake in the Supreme Court abortion pill case; Tuesday’s oral argument is focused on whether to overrule the FDA and reimpose some restrictions on getting medication to terminate pregnancy” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONPeople v Carter [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm
Wexler started her political career in the 1960s when she served on the Westport Zoning Board of Appeals and worked on the campaigns of John Fitzgerald, Eugene McCarthy, Joseph Duffy, and Jimmy Carter. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal The Quiet Way Democrats Hope to Expand Their Power at the State Level DNyuz – Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) | Published: 2/20/2024 Locked out of power on the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Sad facts, sad result The court seemed to express some trepidation about its result, using the same language the First Circuit Court of Appeals used in Jane Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:25 am
“During my sophomore year, I connected with Alexander Booth, who was already with the Rangers, and he provided me valuable advice to make myself an appealing candidate for baseball jobs. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Carter (1972), in which the Court explained that for purposes of such ballot integrity and practical functioning, states can exclude from their ballots “frivolous” candidacies. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Carter (1972), in which the Court explained that for purposes of such ballot integrity and practical functioning, states can exclude from their ballots “frivolous” candidacies. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
Importantly, neither the Colorado Election Code nor the Colorado Supreme Court decision on appeal in this case says anything to the contrary, notwithstanding what some of the parties represent in their briefs. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Supreme Court's resolution of Trump's appeal might not have any practical effect on the Colorado ballots at issue in the case, and raise questions about possible mootness and, at the end of the post, the Court's statutory jurisdiction to adjudicate Trump's appeal. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:41 pm
Since that time, the alleged victims have appealed and the charges have been reinstated, but the case has still not gone to trial amidst ongoing governmental turmoil in Haiti. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
I also understand why the Crown felt it had to appeal, and why the court of appeal corrected me. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:45 am
” Translation: It converted certain civil service positions to at-will appointments and removed rights to appeal, streamlining the process for removing them. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
Court Rejects Twitter’s Claim of Right to Alert Trump to Jan. 6 Search MSN – Rachel Weiner (Washington Post) | Published: 1/16/2024 A federal appeals court rejected Twitter’s claim that Donald Trump should have been alerted to the existence of a search warrant for his data by prosecutors investigating interference in the 2020 election, leaving in place a $350,000 fine imposed on the social media company for not complying on time. [read post]
