Search for: "Carter v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS" Results 81 - 100 of 339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Julia Solomon-Strauss
Roberts identifies the Burr case as the foundation of a consensus that has emerged in the case law in the 200 years since the ruling: “successive Presidents have accepted Marshall’s ruling that the Chief Executive is subject to subpoena,” including when they are called to testify in a criminal proceeding (as Presidents Grant, Ford, Carter, and Clinton did) and disclose official, privileged communications (as Nixon did following United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
You could have subpoenas seeking all of Jimmy Carter’s financial history simply because he was a peanut farmer and they want a case study on agriculture. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Carter Ruck, the law firm representing the Palestinian Return Centre, also published the news on their website. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
Among others, this includes individuals “participating in traditional harvesting and on the land activities that cross the NWT border but do not enter any communities as part of this”. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Con independencia de la necesaria aclaración sobre el alcance de la frase expuesta, en este análisis acerca de la posible práctica ilegal de la profesión por nuestros abogados y abogadas en una jurisdicción a la cual no están admitidos por vía de una página web será preciso en cualquier caso constatar, como parte de los elementos constitutivos de esta cuestión, si en efecto estos y estas están ejerciendo lo que… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 12:16 am by Tessa Shepperson
Errors in Section 8 Notices There has been a useful case on section 8 notices, Pease v Carter, which solicitor David Smith has written up in this article on LinkedIn. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had previously suggested that use of Huawei’s equipment posed a spying risk, saying that “we won’t be able to share information” with nations that put it into their “critical information systems”. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 5:22 pm by India McKinney
But the landmark 2018 Supreme Court decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
Libel is defined as a false and defamatory statement of fact communicated to a third-party about an identifiable living person that damages their reputation. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Libel is defined as a false and defamatory statement of fact communicated to a third-party about an identifiable living person that damages their reputation. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Libel is defined as a false and defamatory statement of fact communicated to a third-party about an identifiable living person that damages their reputation. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
Libel is defined as a false and defamatory statement of fact communicated to a third-party about an identifiable living person that damages their reputation. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
What did the inspector general find, and what didn’t he find, with respect to political bias? [read post]