Search for: "Carter v. Church*" Results 41 - 60 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Continuing his tour of the Middle East region in the wake of the deal, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter met with Saudi leaders in Jeddah yesterday. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Paul alerted us to the Supreme Court’s pending decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
And bad news for gun-toting jaywalkers as the Court denied cert. in Carter v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:01 am by Lyle Denniston
Carter – when is a private lawsuit barred under the False Claims Act because a related lawsuit had been filed earlier Wednesday, January 14: Mellouli v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
With the Carter administration embracing human rights, U.S. diplomats could not help but acknowledge the army’s barbaric behavior against opponents. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Circuit used to support a special doctrine that would be more skeptical of private delegations — Carter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
App. 2010) (finding that the promissory note and the lien which secures it are "separate legal obligations" that "may be litigated in separate lawsuits"); Carter v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Carter 12-1497Issue: (1) Whether the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act – a criminal code provision that tolls the statute of limitations for “any offense” involving fraud against the government “[w]hen the United States is at war,” 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
At the ABA Journal, Terry Carter and James Podgers report on how the Court’s 2009 decision in Caperton v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Carter, R-Baton Rouge, said the Islamic school withdrew its request to participate in the voucher program. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
Carter (docket 11-218), urging the Supreme Court to clarify what it meant in in a seldom-cited ruling decades ago in the case of Rees v. [read post]