Search for: "Carter v. Oliver" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Our previous  Trump v Twitter piece explained how s.230 gives both a shield and a sword to online providers like Twitter and Facebook, providing not only (1) that no provider shall be treated as the publisher of information provided by another (thereby protecting providers, as supposed mere platforms, from legal proceedings regarding what has been said by users on those platforms), but also (2) that where a provider does, in good faith, moderate what is published by American users,… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was sound. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Circuit sitting en banc in 1979 on the political question issue in Goldwater v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 12:15 am
  Consequently, as neither Dcoop nor Olives Way entered into a contract to invest in Bell-Carter Foods, Dcoop and Olives Way lack statutory standing to bring a claim under § 25401. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
Oliver for that proposition. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Carter, Jr., University of Pittsburgh – School of Law. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:30 am
Jimmy Carter was the only full term President to have no appointments. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Carter and Carolyn Sue Carter (collectively, "the Carters"), and the Town of Plainfield ("Plainfield") with regard to the alleged dedication of certain real property to Plainfield and an easement by necessity across the land. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:03 am by Zack Bluestone
Carter suggested that the presence of his Malaysian counterpart “indicates the great demand . . . in this region for the American presence, because it’s been a stabilizing presence for decades. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Average tenures of the justices are increasing; and the haphazard nature of when vacancies occur have resulted in such powerfully important anomalies as President Carter having no appointments during his four-year term and President Trump (who lost the nationwide popular vote) having 3 – one-third of the Court – during his one four-year term. [read post]