Search for: "Case, Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee"
Results 21 - 40
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
I have not been able to find the appellate decision, though it has been referenced by IAM (as a key post-Sisvel v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
See Alexander Holmes, Appellant-Defendant, v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
FIA then sold Madden's debt to Defendant-Appellee Midland Funding, LLC ("Midland Funding"), a debt purchaser. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
FIA then sold Madden's debt to Defendant-Appellee Midland Funding, LLC ("Midland Funding"), a debt purchaser. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Any arbitration shall be conducted in Harris County, Texas, United States of America in the English language. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
Plaintiff-Appellant Vicky Forby ("Forby") appeals the district court's grant of Defendant-Appellee One Technologies, L.P.'s ("One Tech") motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views… [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
Diversity v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Dutko, for All Similarly Situated Plaintiffs, Petitioner.H. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Fish, for appellee. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down its Continental v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
In late 2005, Defendant Chronimed Holdings bought Northland Pharmacy from Plaintiff James P. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 8:22 am
Relying on United States v. [read post]
