Search for: "Case v. Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 3,586
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
” Sufian Taha and Adam Taylor report for the Washington Post. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:13 am by Jocelyn Bosse
He provides some timely reflections on the recent trade mark infringement cases in the US and Europe.Marcel Pemsel discussed the recent EUIPO Board of Appeal decision, which concerned the opposition from car company, Hyundai, to the registration of a trade mark that allegedly resembled several of its trade marks. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:18 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Frantic, Inc. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London case number B326222, in the Court of Appeal in the State of California, Second Appellate District (18 March 2024)] [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
You know, people they were worried about who'd been violent in the stadium before, or Or perhaps the Taylor Swift model of, you know, known stalkers wanting to identify them if they're trying to come into concerts. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 3:36 am by Donald Dinnie
This Gauteng judgment Trident South Africa (Pty) Ltd / Bateman Trident (Pty) Ltd v Shainne John Taylore & 2 Others has reaffirmed that economic pressure does not in itself create a basis to escape a settlement agreement on the grounds of duress. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 14 March 2024 there was a contempt application in the case of Taylor v Chief Constable of Kent, QB-2022-000310. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Rodoy v Optical Express Limited and others KB-2023-002437. [read post]