Search for: "Casey v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am
Section 405(g) provides in relevant part: Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC has mandated environmental disclosure at least as far back as the Nixon Administration. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The Commission devoted significant resources to evaluating its enforcement program in 1972.[9] In January 1972, Chairman William Casey created a three-member committee to “examine the SEC’s enforcement policy and practices, engage in frequent dialogue with the members of the Commission and with our staff, seek and sift the suggestions of the bar and make recommendations to the Commission for worthwhile improvements to our time-honored ways. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:21 am
Deputy Workers' Compensation Commissioner Michelle McGovern noted that at the time Gallo met with Mootz, Gallo was collecting more than $5,000 per month in disability benefits from the Railroad Retirement Board, the Social Security Administration and the workers' compensation carrier for Penford. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
On 18 November 2015, the Administrative Court gave judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast ([2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
