Search for: "Cathcart v. Cathcart"
Results 101 - 120
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
IPSO Brian Cathcart has considered the status of IPSO in a post on Hacked Off, critiquing the regulator following comments by the Culture Secretary Matt Hancock seeking to affirm the effectiveness of the press regulator. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The trial of El Naschie v MacMillan Publishers Ltd began before Sharp J (without a jury) on Monday 31 October 2011. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Austria: A student group Europe v Facebook is to pursue a civil data protection case against Facebook, via Pogowasright. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
” We published a post by Brian Cathcart about Roy Greenslade’s claims in the Guardian that the implantation of section 40 would mean that “press freedom was in danger. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
We had a post examining the accuracy of Oborne’s accusations from the MST’s Gordon Ramsay and pieces by Brian Cathcart and Des Freedman. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
First, in Marley v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
Byline Investigates has a piece by Brian Cathcart entitled “Meghan Move is really about dishonest journalism“. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
In a recent INFORRM post Brian Cathcart criticises the Guardian’s recent support of the Government in its decision not to implement Part 2 of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
Brian Cathcart filleted Fraser Nelson’s self-congratulatory piece about the story in the Telegraph. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
In a letter in the same paper Brian Cathcart pointed out that the responsibility of News UK for Mahmood’s activities had not been addressed. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
WINN v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm
We had a post about the decision by Brian Cathcart. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
Mr Jem Aldridge v The Hunts Post (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Carl Waring v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; A woman v The Argus (Brighton) 03/05/2012; Mr Mark Gunter v Guernsey Press & Star (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Leonard Kernott v Daily Mail (Clause 3), 03/05/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Northamptonshire Evening Telegraph (Clause 1), 01/05/2012; A woman v East Riding Mail (Clauses 3, 9), 30/04/2012. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
In Simao v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
In an article on the campaign’s site, Brian Cathcart argues: “We need disclosure now, during the Leveson inquiry, because otherwise the files will be buried for ever. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
On Inforrm, Professor Brian Cathcart argued that the press are “lashing out like cornered animals“. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
There are a number of resolved cases to report, including: Mr Phillip Scofield v Best, Clause 1, 30/03/2012; Mr Craig Whittaker MP v Halifax Evening Courier, Clause 1, 29/03/2012; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 28/03/2012; A man v Daily Mail, clause 1, 3, 5, 28/03/2012; Mr Nathan Roberts v Daily Mail, clause 1, 2, 28/03/2012; Mr Andrew Morgan v The Sun, clause 1, 28/03/2012; Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, clause 12, 26/03/2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
In an attempt to persuade Tory Rebels to vote against the Leveson 2 amendments, the government added an amendment 62BC which provides that the Secretary of State mandate a review of press regulators alternative dispute resolution procedures, Brian Cathcart considers this in an INFORRM post. [read post]
