Search for: "Cato v. Ives"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm
That ruling came a year after the Court, in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 1:02 pm
Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute 3:45 – 4:05PM BREAK 4:05 – 5:15PM SESSION V: BREAKOUT SESSIONS In the Shadow of NAFTA: Dairy, Lumber, and Bombardier Ed Farrell, OFW LawDan Ikenson, Herbert A. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
[UPDATE: I can't believe I forgot to mention that Cato will be hosting a event for my new paper - with me, Tim Carney and John Magnus (and free food and drink to follow) - on October 9th in DC. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Cole v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
Adler Professor of Law & Director of the Center for Business Law & Regulation Case Western Reserve University School of Law As SCOTUSBlog readers may know, I participated in an amicus brief for the Cato Institute and several law professors arguing against standing in this case, so I find the Chief Justice's dissent more agreeable than the standing analysis in Part IV of Justice Stevens' opinion. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
Tyson et al. in oppositionBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Cato InstituteReply of petitioner Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:30 pm
Rose Mary Knick, the plaintiff in Knick v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Part IV will turn to an area that is very much in flux: severability. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:56 pm
Earlier today, I submitted an amicus brief to the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Texas v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
Article IV territorial officers hold "Office[s] under the Authority of the United States," and are bound by the Sinecure Clause. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv). [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
(I filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Cato Institute in Guedes v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
Abbott, on behalf of the Cato Institute and myself. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am
As the Court explained in Roth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
Larbie v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
But John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy observes that only “[f]ive of the current members of the Court had unanimous debut opinions. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Phelps (2011) Matal v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
In McDonald v. [read post]
