Search for: "Cato v. Ives" Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
In a classic case of "government being government," the Obama administration, the Democratically-controlled Senate and the Republican-controlled House could not get their collective act together before the August recess to grant Russia PNTR, despite the fact that (i) all sides (leadership, at least) agreed that they wanted to make PNTR happen; (ii) both key committees (Senate Finance and House Ways & Means) had overwhelmingly approved their respective PNTR bills; (iii)… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:31 pm
The anti-trade activists at Public Citizen recently contended that "[v]irtually every Democrat in a tough race has at least one paid television ad attacking offshoring, and many propose changes to the tax system to combat it. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Part IV examines the three major state supreme court cases involving Bowie knives: In Georgia, Nunn v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 4:52 am by Simon Lester
My Cato colleague Huan Zhu translated a Chinese news report about this issue as follows: The Ministry of Commerce held a press conference today. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Last Friday was Constitution Day, a day when, by law, every educational institution receiving federal funds has to educate its students about the constitution (Ruthann Robson, Constitutional Law Prof Blog). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]