Search for: "Cavanagh v. Cavanagh" Results 1 - 20 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 9:09 am by Connecticut Law Blog
Dentist, Injuries, Negligence and Informed Consent: Connecticut Supreme Court David Shortell v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:42 am
Today's advance release property law opinion: Cavanagh v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:20 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
A Canada Revenue Agency employee’s moonlighting activities constituted a serious conflict of interest and, along with his subsequent insubordination, gave the employer sufficient cause to terminate the employee, the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board recently confirmed in Cavanagh v Canada Revenue Agency. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:21 pm by Julie Lam
 Justices Cavanagh, Marilyn Kelly, and Hathaway would grant leave to appeal. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:35 pm by Julie Lam
 Justice Cavanagh would deny leave to appeal. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:56 pm
On Friday, September 25, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
Proceeding with disciplinary action in situations where disability may be a considerationMatter of Schlitz v Cavanagh, 14 Misc.3d 1213(A The significant issue in the Schlitz case concerned the interplay of two different provisions of the Civil Service Law: (1) serving disciplinary charges against an individual pursuant to Section 75 and (2) Section 72, which is triggered in cases of an employee’s inability to perform the duties of the position because of non-work related… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued  its opinion in People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:59 am
Disability as a defense in disciplinary actionsMatter of Schlitz v Cavanagh, 2007 NY Slip Op 50026(U), Supreme Court, Suffolk County The significant issue in the Schlitz case concerned the interplay of two different provisions of the Civil Service Law: 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:59 am by Nicole Mazzocco
  Justice Cavanagh wrote separately to emphasize his continued adherence to his dissenting positions in Paragon Properties Co. v. [read post]