Search for: "Celebrity v. Celebrity"
Results 81 - 100
of 7,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2018, 7:47 am
On cue, IPKat celebrates some important female inventors in IP that we should all know! [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:32 am
EFF, together with the Organization for Transformative Works, has filed an amicus brief in Davis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:35 am
Barak Richman (pictured, left) and Dennis Schmelzer (pictured right) have a new article up on SSRN on the celebrated case of Lucy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:03 pm
In LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230 (QB), Mr Justice Warby granted an interim injunction restraining unknown defendants from publishing serious allegations of criminality against a celebrity, anonymised in the proceedings as ‘LJY’. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:33 am
We have much to celebrate this year as Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
In its 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:37 am
Monge v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Just because you cut the hair of a B-list celebrity does not make you a celebrity. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 2:00 am
Zimring was celebrated as the Brown... [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 8:30 am
See Korematsu v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:00 pm
Iqbal celebrates(?) [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:20 am
The title of the seminar is a reference to Saint Crispin's Day, and the Saint Crispin's Day speech from Shakespeare's Henry V; in Henry V, Henry gave a rallying speech to the outnumbered English forces in the Battle of Agincourt. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Adding to the strangeness of today’s ruling, the same three-judge panel simultaneously issued an excellent free speech decision in Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 10:00 am
However, as the Supreme Court recently reminded us all in Google LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:42 pm
" Here are snippets from this post: Basically, what the government is arguing here is that Snipes needs to be hammered for his celebrity. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
And in Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 2:48 am
Celebrities enjoy no extra right to privacy Murray v Express Newspapers plc and Another “Where an individual was engaged in innocuous, routine activity in a public place, such as a street, that activity attracted no right or expectation of privacy and, accordingly, there was no prohibition on the taking or publishing of photographs of famous people engaged in such activity in a public place unless there were special circumstances such as harassment or distress caused to… [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
We recently reminded readers about the $25 million punitive damages award against OJ Simpson in the civil action (Rufo v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 8:17 am
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:15 pm
Last week we celebrated the 60th anniversary of the decision in Gideon v. [read post]
