Search for: "Cellino & Barnes, P.C. v York"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
BRUMMER, , v THE BARNES FIRM, P.C., CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., STEPHEN E. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:46 am
The fourth, KEITH LONG, , v CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., THE BARNES FIRM, P.C., STEPHEN E. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:09 am
SPENCE, P.C., APPELLANT; THE BARNES FIRM, P.C., SUCCESSOR TO CELLINO & BARNES, RESPONDENT. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:09 am
SPENCE, P.C., APPELLANT; THE BARNES FIRM, P.C., SUCCESSOR TO CELLINO & BARNES, RESPONDENT. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
In Provenzano v Cellino & Barnes, P.C. 2022 NY Slip Op 04749 Decided on July 27, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department we see an illustration of the “no harm-no foul” spirit of legal malpractice. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:05 am
We note that, on a prior appeal, we affirmed an order granting, inter alia, those parts of the cross motion of defendants seeking summary judgment dismissing the second and third causes of action against them (Long v Cellino & Barnes, P.C., 59 AD3d 1062). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:55 am
“The determination whether a corporation should be dissolved is within the discretion of the [trial] court” (Matter of Cellino v Cellino & Barnes, P.C., 175 AD3d 1120, 1121 [4th Dept 2019]; see Business Corporation Law § 1111 [a]). [read post]
