Search for: "Cellphone Termination Fee Cases"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Yesterday, the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Five) certified for partial publication its opinion in In re Cellphone Fee Termination Cases, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jun. 28, 2010; pub. ord. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm
This initially unpublished opinion in Cellphone Fee Termination Cases (July 27, 2010) follows from a consolidated appeal in one of several coordinated class actions that challenged wireless telephone carriers' practice of charging early termination fees (ETF's) on customers seeking to cancel cellular telephone contracts. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:42 am
In re Cellphone Termination Fee Cases (2009) 180 Cal. [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:00 am
They were filed in In re Cellphone Termination Fee Cases, Alameda County Superior Court, JCCP no. 4332, and address the impact of Fireside Bank, the one-way intervention decision, on the scheduling of various types of motions: Plaintiffs' Supplemental Case Management Conference Statement (filed 04/20/07) Defendants' Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities Regarding Fireside Bank v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:17 am
The opinion, styled Cellphone Termination Fee Cases, __ Cal. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:53 am
The case definitely highlights for me the wierd nature of fee awards in class actions. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
On July 27, 2010, the First District (Division five) issued an order changing the publication status of the Cellphone Fee Termination Cases, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2010) from unpublished to published. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:41 pm
Cellphone Fee Termination Cases (June 28, 2010, publication ordered July 27, 2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 1380, arises out of an action challenging a cellphone carrier's imposition of early termination fees on customers canceling their contracts. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:42 pm
See Cellphone Fee Termination Cases, 122 Cal. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:22 am
In Cellphone Termination Fee Cases, 193 Cal. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:00 pm
The suits also prompted all four of the phone providers to reduce the fees charged to costumers who terminate a mobile phone contract before it expires. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
Citation: In re Cellphone Fee Termination Cases, 193 Cal. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:00 am
These kinds of network fees have never existed in the E.U. and are a violation of the E.U. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Jan. 4, 2010) (order denying panel rehearing and en banc rehearing) (amended opinion reversing order denying class certification of claims brought in habeas corpus proceeding; see this prior blog post on original Rodriguez opinion) Cellphone Termination Fee Cases, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Dec. 31, 2009) (First Appellate District, Division Five) (affirming final approval of class action settlement and attorneys' fees award) [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:44 pm
A Petition for Review was denied in Cellphone Termination Fee Cases, ___ Cal. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Upon request, carriers will unlock devices or provide unlock information to customers, former customers, or other eligible owners who have completed their postpaid service contract, paid off their device financing plan, or paid an early termination fee. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 7:18 am
If you, the long-suffering subscriber, decide that you have had enough and wish to try your luck with another company, you're free to pay your early-termination fee and go. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:54 am
” Some of the key aspects of the new code, which is to be effective for new wireless contracts beginning on December 2nd, include: allowing the termination of contracts after two years without cancellation fees; caps on data and roaming charges to avoid “bill shock” ($50 and $100 unless customer consent); have cellphones unlocked after 90 days (or immediately where devices are paid in full); the right to accept or decline changes to key terms of fixed… [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
The Imburgia dispute is similar in many respects; plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit in California court against DIRECTV alleging false advertising and unfair competition concerning DIRECTV’s charging of early termination fees to its customers. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 6:28 am
All international traffic must be routed through Israeli providers, with Palestinian companies paying connection and termination fees to them. [read post]
