Search for: "Center for Regulatory Reasonableness v. EPA" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 1:03 pm by WIMS
The panel upheld the EPA's statutory and regulatory interpretations. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a proposed consent decree intended to resolve the case, Center for Food Safety, et al. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 3:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The reason there is some uncertainty about the proper test is because the last time the Court considered this question, in Rapanos v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm by WIMS
EPA's disapproval of Texas' permitting program has unraveled approximately 140 permits, created great regulatory uncertainty, and stalled the creation of thousands of new jobs. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
The fact that EPA’s greenhouse-gas-inclusive interpretation of the PSD and Title V triggers would place plainly excessive demands on limited governmental resources is alone a good reason for rejecting it; but that is not the only reason. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:21 pm by Leland E. Beck
EPA Determination:  The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in Sierra Club v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:38 am by Robert Oszakiewski
UPDATE: The parties in International Center for Technology Assessment et al v Hamburg, in a stipulation filed with the court on January 13, 2012, agreed  to grant the EPA " an extension of time to April 23, 2012 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint". [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:08 pm
May 18, 2009, at the EPA Potomac Yard Conference Center, Arlington, VA; and May 21, 2009, at the Bell Harbor International Conference Center in Seattle, WA. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew Wheeler defended the move by stating that the “final rule puts in place a sensible one national program that strikes the right regulatory balance that protects our environment, and sets reasonable targets for the auto industry. [read post]
2 May 2014, 6:25 am
Environmentalist groups hailed the Supreme Court’s decision in EPA v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
The Court’s ruling significantly narrows EPA’s climate-related regulatory power and restricts the Biden Administration’s ability to mitigate the effects of climate change. [read post]