Search for: "Central Maine Power v. MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 2:27 pm by VDEPG Administrator
Today, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the Maine Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) erred by not resolving health and safety concerns raised by some Central Maine Power Company (CMP) customers in relation to CMP’s wireless “smart-meter” technology. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 10:33 am by Shelton Abramson
The Commission issued two orders in mid-2011 requiring that the Central Maine Power Company (CMP) provide customers with an option to opt out of smart meter installation. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 10:33 am by Shelton Abramson
The Commission issued two orders in mid-2011 requiring that the Central Maine Power Company (CMP) provide customers with an option to opt out of smart meter installation. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm by Nigel Howard
Maine Public Utilities Commission and Central Maine Power Company. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by Nigel Howard
Maine Public Utilities Commission and Central Maine Power Company, the Maine Supreme Court issued its decision on July 12, 2012.  [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by Nigel Howard
Maine Public Utilities Commission and Central Maine Power Company, the Maine Supreme Court issued its decision on July 12, 2012. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
 This level of concentrated power over a central means of communication has an outsized impact on public discourse and political debate in this country. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Central Bureau of Investigation and another [(2008) 9 SCC 677] and Manoj Sharma v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
What is the utility and importance of the public interest litigation? [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 3:33 am
  An earlier constitutional objection to the public use of the taking was rejected in Goldstein v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:24 am by David Hart QC
Also it requires the consent of the Treasury to certain transactions…… f) The extent to which in carrying out the relevant function the body is publicly funded, or is exercising statutory powers, or is taking the place of central government or local authorities, or is providing a public service. [read post]